How it does it work?
From a technological point of view, a wheat kernel is composed of three parts:
- Germ (embryo)
- Endosperm
- Bran (pericarp)
Using average values, the germ constitutes 2.5%, the bran 14.5%, and the endosperm 83% (starchy portion that contains gluten-forming proteins) of the wheat kernel weight.1
Complete separation of the bran, endosperm, and germ can never be achieved by the dry milling process. As a consequence, the theoretical yield of approximately 83% flour (or 100% pure endosperm) is never achieved.
In practice, extraction rate values of 72–76% are normally obtained in efficient mills depending on the class of wheat used. Higher extraction rate values (>83%) will always mean a greater proportion of bran particles in the resulting flour.
Application
The chemical composition, physical appearance, baking performance and dough handling properties of a given wheat flour depend on its extraction rate (ER). As long as the ER is below 100%, the composition of the flour will always differ from the composition of the original grain.
The higher the ER means more bran is present in the milled flour but this is not the only direct consequence. High extraction rates of flour are reflected in the following aspects:
- Lower breadmaking quality or performance of flour. The presence of bran disrupts the gluten-protein matrix (causing less mixing tolerance and stability of dough), weakening dough properties and reducing gas retention capacity of dough during fermentation.
- Reduced volume of baked bread.
- Higher ash content and darker flour (more bran and germ particles “contaminating” the white endosperm).
- Higher total protein content as the outer layers also have protein (particularly non-functional or non-gluten forming protein).
- Higher levels of non-starch polysaccharides (e.g. fiber materials such as hemicellulose or arabinoxylans, β-Glucans). These play a major role in water absorption.
- Higher water retention (binding) capacity, which means more water is needed to produce a dough of standard handling properties and consistency.
- Higher the enzymatic activity (i.e. higher protease, lipase and amylase activity).
- Shorter shelf-life of flour (e.g. oxidative rancidity).
- Higher microbial load. All pericarp or bran layers (especially those exposed to ambient conditions) remain in the finished flour.
- Higher nutritional value of flour.
ER of hard wheat and its relationship with flour grades and composition
Flour Grade | Extraction Rate2,3(%) | Protein2,3(%) | Ash2,3(%) | Fiber Proportion | Starch Proportion | Comments and Uses |
Straight grade | 75.0–76.0 (hard wheat)
72.0 (soft wheat) |
10.5–12.0 | 0.48–0.58 | Lower than clear | Higher than clear | Produced by separating the maximum amount of starchy endosperm from the bran and germ.
Blend of all flour streams obtained after milling, sieving and purifying. Usually destined to all-purpose (family) flours. |
Clear (low-grade) | 65.0–72.0 | 12.0–16.0 | 0.60–1.30 | Higher than straight grade and patent
Lower than whole wheat |
Lower than straight grade and patent | Lower grade flour remaining after the patent flour has been separated from total wheat flour produced:
(Straight Grade – Patent = Clear). Compared to straight grade flour, clear flours have a darker color, more ash, higher protein, and a stronger flavor. Used in dark breads (variety and hearth bread). |
Patent | 45.0 (short or standard patent flour)
65.0 (long patent flour) |
11.0–13.5 | 0.45–0.55 | Lowest value | Highest
value |
Obtained by selecting some of the streams produced. Millers only use the high-grade streams with the whiter color, generally from the first section of the reduction system.
A patent flour is more costly for bakers than other flour grades. Excellent for white bread and buns. |
Whole wheat flour | 100.0 | 9.0–14.0 | 1.5–2.0 | Highest | Lowest | No separation of kernel components is done; only size reduction of grain is carried out.
Used in variety and sourdough bread. |
* Values reported on a 14% moisture basis.
References
- Eliasson, A.C., and Larsson, K. “Flour.” Cereals in Breadmaking: A Molecular Colloidal Approach, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993, pp. 241–256.
- Cauvain, S.P. “Wheat Milling and Flour Testing.” Technology of Breadmaking, 3rd edition, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015, pp. 339–373.
- Posner, E.S. “Wheat Flour Milling.” Wheat Chemistry and Technology, 4th edition, AACC International, Inc., 2009, pp. 119–141.